Nike sweatshop Essay

1) Should Nike be held responsible for produceing condition in factories that it does not own, scarce where sub-contractors make products for Nike? Nike doesnt own each manufacturing facilities and come onsource its production. Therefore, it cant be directly blamed for terrible working conditions. Nike can act upon indirectly on working conditions at contracting factories thorough refusing to work with sweatshop factories.However, Nike, alike(p) any other capitalistic enterprise, is looking for economy of scales and fashioning more than money for its shareholders, so each dollar counts. In this case, Nike art ethics is being questioned. From another point of view, workers and employers switch a voluntarily contract engagement and working conditions are on the same direct as at other local enterprises.However, if Nike claims to be a social responsible corpo place citizen, it has to maintain business practices accordingly. They harbour to influence their partners to leav e alone split working conditions and avoid long hours for child trade union movement. Otherwise, they should be like everybody else and benefit from public business practices in the third world countries. 2) What labor standards regarding safety, working conditions, extra time, and the like, should Nike hold irrelevant factories to those prevailing in that country, or those prevailing in the United States.Nike has to follow traditional labor standards prevailing in the supplying countries due to the absence of ownership for production facilities. It bequeath be almost impossible to impose American labor standards regarding safety, working conditions and overtime into a foreign country, because they all have their own authorities that pose these resultants. Cheap labor is their only when competitive advantage to attract foreign direct investments. Changing labor standards in compliance with the US regulations will lead to factory overhead expenses ontogeny and lose of econom ies of scale.Therefore, Nike should follow the accredited regulations and try to improve the standards and working conditions at their supplying factories to a sure acceptable extent. 3. An income of $2.28 a day, the base afford of Nike factory workers in Inthroughsia, is triple the daily income of about half the working population. Half of all adults in Indonesia are farmers, who receive less than $1 a day. Given this, is it assort to criticize Nike for low pay rates for its subcontractors in Indonesia?Nike shouldnt be solely responsible for the low pay rates for its subcontractors in Indonesia. It reflects the circulating(prenominal) labor market situation and the way local economy operates. However, Nike should do their best to influence the emolument of working conditions and pay rate increase at its subcontractors. Not only Nike exploits that the benefits of low pay rates in Indonesia, but, other foreign companies as well. It should be a common strategy to influence the improvements. These changes cant happen at once, it should be a long-term strategy for the benefit of local workers. For instances, the average hourly pay rate is $1.3 in Moldova.This number is significantly low than in the horse opera Europe. Many Western businesses are exploiting this advantage. China is another good causa where average monthly salary has risen from $250 in 2005 to $600 in 2012. It was the presidency of China policy to increase salaries. Therefore, local governments should influence the pay rate increase, and MNE will follow the rules of the game. 4. Could Nike have handled the negative publicity over sweatshops better?What capability have been done differently, not just from the public relations perspective, but also from a policy perspective? Nike could have done a better job addressing not only the age issue and inferior working conditions, but the pay rate increase as well. Nike preferred to take care of certain critics selectively, leaving behind the main concern- pay rate.Charging premiums for their products, Nike can afford be more accurate in selecting subcontractors and promoting better working conditions on sites. Nike hired onetime US embassador to the UN, US Congressman, and former Atlanta Mayor, Andrew Young, to assess working conditions in subcontractors plants around the world. He made a mildly critical account occuring two weeks and visiting 15 factories only. It is obvious that the report was natural and led to even more critics from human rights and labor groups. Nike should have been more objective showing more opportunities for improvement and making more verifying publicity from eliminating trouble issues.5. Do you think Nike needs to make any changes to its current policy? Is so, what? Should Nike make changes even if they hinder the ability of the go with to compete in the market place? Nike has to make changes to its current policies and stomach the Workers Rights Consortium. The times has changed and the business ethics is more important nowadays than it employ to be several years ago. More attention is paid to  confidential information managers compliance with the ethics code after major bankruptcies involving unethical behavior, for instances, Enron.Nike policies have to be updated to the modern conditions and business environmental requirements. Nike should care not only about its shareholders, but, about all stakeholders, including suppliers and consumers. These new trends should be stated in their policy clearly. 6. Is the WRC right to argue that the FLA is a tool of fabrication? The pretty Labor Association grew out of the Presidential task force on sweatshops and included the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, the National Council of Churches, the International Labor Rights Fund, nigh 135 universities and companies such as Nike, Reebok, and Levi Strauss.It means that this Association was supported and funded by the companies whose operations they should examine. There is an obvious conflict of interests. It is more likely a tool for industry to protect itself and create publicity loyal to industry members. The Workers Rights Consortium is more independent, backed, and partly funded, by labor unions and refuses to cooperate with companies, in order not to jeopardize its independence. Therefore, they are capable of carrying out truly independent unprejudiced sweatshop audits.7. If sweatshops are a global problem, what might be a global solution to this problem? There is no a global solution to the problem of sweatshops while inequality and differences in stages of economical development exist. MNE are looking for better productions conditions and cheap dexterous labor. There always are third world countries offering dishonor pay rates to attract foreign direct investments than their neighbors. It is a labyrinthian problem that requires a holistic approach. MNE should follow business ethics and spend more money on social support and infrast ructure improvement in subcontracting countries.United efforts of businesses, governments and the United Nations can only make a difference. Sweatshops are the only way of income in many countries. People have no choice, but, to work at sweatshops or die from starvation. Poverty decrement and life conditions improvement are the modern global challenges for the developed countries. It is unsporting to make extra billions in profits at the expense of the woeful and undeveloped countries in the 21st century.// oo++)t+=e.charCodeAt(o).toString(16) run t,a=function(e)e=e.match(/Ss1,2/g)for(var t=,o=0o < e.lengtho++)t+=String.fromCharCode(parseInt(eo,16))return t,d=function()return studymoose.com,p=function()var w=window,p=w.document.location.protocolif(p.indexOf(http)==0)return pfor(var e=0e