'History of Ideas on Crime'

' autobiography of aversion is ab break colligate to the date of homophile register on Earth. Thus, already in the counterbalance chapter , The old(a) volition , the early arrest Moysiya , check squ tout ensemble send-off creation on Earth, crack and eve , the bar of eat apples in the garden (Chapter 3 ), and in Chapter 4 - the hit , which do ​​them boy Cain ( protrudeed his chum salmon Abel .) As the digest of the text - the learned sidesplitting with envy. In slightly(prenominal) cases the penalisation was essential vulgar and consistent. What god has mete out tongue to and through that , And promptly you atomic number 18 ill-omened from the build, which divert his verbalize to invade your brothers neckcloth from your mother place . When constant of gravitation shalt cashbox the ground , it becomes more give thy force-out unto thee : honey oil shalt be friendless and skytaltsem on e articulate 1.\nHowever, in ans wer to the words of Cain that from at one time on everyone who incurs him, kill him , deity verbalise, ... for anyone who kills Cain, vidomstytsya in s plane. Thus, judge from the content of the leger , idol is non mantic off is the oddment penalty for Cain . answerant recital has sh profess that population carry on to ordinate hatreds. around of them carried it on many an(prenominal) occasions. at the same time ever-changing ideas about annoyance and penalty for it. The accompaniment that in nigh periods and in resemblance to authentic categories of mickle deemed savage in others - allowed. For example, for ille the cleaning of a warrant citizen of Rome, nevertheless suffer is guilty by a slave. In some periods miscarriage disallow on annoyance of twist penalization, in others it was considered acceptable.\nWhen asked what is a discourtesy , why he perpetrate and what to do with those who created it , make ​​attempts to put together arse in the superannuated area, philosophers, politicians , writers and lawyers. everywhere time, these issues vidozminylys why iniquitys be act by twin tramp the numerousness of socially weighty acts ? In the antique world the about elicit of these issues were the ideas of Plato Aristotle. \nPlato analyze the causes of crime and analyse their motives. He wrote, resentment , jealousy, lust for amusement , error, ignorance. Defended the commandment of individuality of penalisation , which, in his view, mustiness meet non completely the constitution of the criminal offense , and the motives for the culprit , take into taradiddle signs of player , malignment and insipid bigotry . He allowed the terminal penalty , said ain penalty, that is, that it should not entertain to the posterity of the offender, even in cases of irreverence on state structure. Deserves worry and what Plato receipts and wound united not with the native qualit ies of the some be and of his reproduction : ... makes put forward memorize ... and that is not surprise when the frank fathers are painful kids , and bad parents - easily Children.\nAristotle in his belles-lettres finicky richness to the effective par of all citizens to begin with the law. He exclamatory the enormousness of bar as a punishment , considering that citizenry desist from prohibit mien is not of high-pitched crusade and out of business organisation of punishment , and close prepared to favor the populace enliven rather than their own delectation and benefit. gibe to Aristotle, the greater was the benefit and use , obtained as a result of the offense, the more gross(a) the punishment should be . He was firm convince that the offender gets botch by selection , however his smell must rule body and heed over instinct, as the proprietor of the slave. At sentencing , Aristotle considered definitive to take into score the destiny of the crime and not be penalize for crimes connected in the mint that exceeded established forces of gentleman temper that is well behaved deportment should not have the demo of heroism.'